fbpx
What You Need to Know About Psychometric Testing
What You Need to Know About Psychometric Testing

psychometric testing - so many optionsOver the years I have heard many people refer to themselves and/or others as a specific personality type – as defined after doing some ‘psychometric testing.’ I won’t argue or debate whether anyone should be neatly packed into a box labelled Type A (i.e., ambitious, rigidly organized, highly status-conscious, impatient, proactive and obsessed with time management) or Type B (i.e., even-tempered, patient, less competitive, easy-going, etc.). I’m much more comfortable with nuance and including psychometric testing as part of a larger process. I am also interested in exploring how temperaments operate at work and in general.

One client said to me:

“I realized the profession I was in seemed to attract a lot of Type A personalities, and I am so not a type A … I’m chill and not at all about competition or aggressively goal-driven. I like to be around people who are easy going and not so focused on beating someone to the punch. It made my place of work feel tense and unfriendly at times … I guess I just didn’t fit in.”

This got me wondering – how well do various personality types mix while working together? And, how can employees and employers use this information to have people working in roles that are a good fit for their unique dispositions?

psychometric testing - to predict personality and behaviourWe already know that no two people are identical (regardless of similar test scores), and we appreciate that peoples’ moods and behaviour can change depending on their circumstances and motivations. Where do we start?

Most of us have heard of various personality tests or psychometric testing. These are a standard and scientific method used to measure individuals’ mental capabilities and behavioural style. Psychometric testing measures candidates’ suitability for a role based on the required personality characteristics and aptitude (or cognitive abilities).

Common tests measure familiar qualities like introversion, extraversion, personality, leadership, and aptitudes like numerical reasoning, verbal reasoning, and logic.

It’s a huge industry that ranges from free assessments to others that must be paid for and used under specific circumstances. The latter, more expensive assessments are administered and interpreted by people with an MA or PhD in Psychology (or similar background). Naturally, some of the free/cheaper tests are popular (e.g., Type A/B, DISC, Myers-Briggs, etc.) while others are obscure to the general population.

Many of these tests have been criticized as being part of pseudo-science where unvalidated opinions have been falsely equated with facts. When this happens ‘for fun’ by individuals, it can be fairly harmless. When tests with questionable reliability (or consistency) and validity (it measures what it’s supposed to measure) are used to make decisions about who should be hired or promoted, it’s a much more serious problem.

 

psychometric testing can be high stakesSafe Ways to Use Assessments in the Context of Employment

  1. Be careful about using psychometric testing to make hiring decisions since not all tests are reliable or valid – especially when used in ways that were not anticipated by the test developers.
  2. Use psychometric testing as part of your evaluation, not your main/only evaluation. Understandably, some candidates get very nervous during high stakes evaluations. If they never get a chance to speak for themselves or show what they’re capable of then it could result in lost opportunities – for employers and candidates.
  3. Consider using psychometric testing for non-threatening professional development so that test-takers get better insights about themselves and can make use of opportunities to become better individual contributors and/or leaders executives. That creates true win/win situations for employers and employees.

 

This is a huge topic with broad implications. If you’d like to discuss the use of psychometric testing in the context of

 

I invite you to book a free and confidential initial consultation by phone or contact me via email, or via direct message on TwitterFacebook, or LinkedIn.

Mentoring-by-the-Minute

If something urgent comes up, I’m also available by a voice or video on Magnifi, an expertise-on-demand app.

 

More than career coaching, it’s career psychology®.

I/O Advisory Services – Building Resilient Careers and Organizations.

Please share this article using any of the social media icons below.

Latest Posts

A Snapshot of Black Psychologists in Canada

A Snapshot of Black Psychologists in Canada

Although the CPA did not believe collecting disaggregated demographic data was a priority, the Black Psychology Section executive members started to collect this data as an interim measure. The Section’s hope and expectation is that the CPA and the various provincial and territorial Colleges of Psychology will ultimately take on this responsibility since they are connected to all psychologists working in Canada through the process of accreditation.

Things to do after you’ve been laid off …

Things to do after you’ve been laid off …

Certain experiences are common, but that does not make them easy to manage. Being laid off is one of those problematic yet common experiences.
In this blog article, I’m offering some ideas to support the thousands of people who are dealing with being laid off.

Six Good Career Books to Add to Your Library This Year

Six Good Career Books to Add to Your Library This Year

Summer is a natural time to indulge in some new reading material. With summer reading in mind, here are six good career books worth adding to your library whether as a physical book you’ll want to highlight and underline, or as an audiobook, which is a great use of time when you’re driving, walking, gardening, etc.

Rethinking and Modernizing Executive Presence

Rethinking and Modernizing Executive Presence

As an executive coach, clients sometimes ask me for advice on how to develop their executive presence. And every now and then, someone will make it clear that they have a very narrow definition of executive presence — and it usually rubs me the wrong way. The unstated subtext is that “real executives” fit a certain template, and that template does not include certain types of leaders, despite being accomplished and effective.  Thankfully, after so many years of tech executives capturing headlines and broad attention, attitudes have certainly shifted — and the dress code has definitely evolved.