fbpx
Difficult Conversations: From Painful to Productive (Part 3 of 3)
Difficult Conversations: From Painful to Productive (Part 3 of 3)

co-workers avoid difficult conversationsIn Parts One and Two of this blog series, I wrote about how conflict avoidance seems to be the most common—but also the most ineffective—strategy for handling difficult conversations.

Not only is conflict avoidance an ineffective strategy, but putting off difficult conversations (including delivering feedback) frequently sees relatively minor, easily rectified issues linger and escalate to the point where workplaces can become toxic, reputations are harmed, and people outright quit their jobs.

Countless business/organizational failures are the result of avoiding difficult conversations because people were afraid to raise contentious issues until it was too late.

Understandably, many equate a difficult conversation with an argument, and we immediately envision the worst-case scenario – a highly emotional confrontation fueled by anger, frustration and raised voices, resulting in nothing more than lingering resentment and repercussions and a situation where there’s a perception of a winner or a loser. But let’s face it, the more contentious it is, the more likely everyone loses in some way.

But when we approach difficult conversations as opportunities for constructive debate, we set ourselves up for outcomes that are actually productive and rewarding for everyone. The classic win-win situation!

I had a conversation recently with someone who recommended a framework for handling challenging conversations from The Center for Creative Leadership. It’s called the Situation-Behavior-Impact (SBI) Model. I’ve used some other models and techniques over the years, but I like the simplicity of the SBI approach and how it applies to many workplace situations.

The SBI Model gives us a framework for giving feedback, so we can stay focused and avoid being judgmental. It makes us pause and ask questions before we fill in the blanks or make assumptions about the person or situation. We have to be careful NOT to jump to conclusions based on our past experiences in similar situations.

 

Overview of the SBI Model:

  • Situation [S]: Describe the situation and the event that occurred in a specific and straightforward manner. Focus on the facts by describing the behaviour you observed, without adding your personal interpretations.
  • Behaviour [B]: Describe the behaviour without judging it. Don’t assume you know someone’s intention or thinking. Be curious and give the other person an opportunity to explain, rather than judge or jump to your own conclusions.
  • Impact [I]: Describe your thoughts and/or how you felt about the behaviour. How did their actions affect you and/or others on the team? Focus on information that can be observable/measurable.

 

difficult conversations with coworkersHere are some examples to help make this more concrete:

Situation: Describe the specific situation in which the behaviour occurred. Avoid generalities, which can lead to confusion and defensiveness.

Example:      “Yesterday at our 10 am meeting …”

Avoid:          “You tend to,” …  “You always,”  or   “Last week.”

 

Behaviour: Describe the actual, observable behaviour. Stick to the facts. Don’t insert what you think their intention or thinking was, or make judgments.

Example:      “You interrupted me while I was talking.”

Avoid:          “You were rude, …”  or    “You probably think …”

 

Impact: Describe the results of the behaviour. In this step, you’re describing exactly what happened and explaining your feelings — not passing judgment — and the listener is more likely to absorb what you’re saying.

If the effect was positive, words like “happy” or “proud” help underscore the success of the behaviour. If the effect of the behaviour was negative and needs to stop, you can use words such as “troubled” or “worried.”

“I was impressed by how well prepared you were for that meeting,” or “I was frustrated when you interrupted me in the middle of an important train of thought.”

 

One More Thing: Intent

This is where you can get some clarification on someone’s actions and turn the feedback process into more of a productive two-way discussion.

  • “What was your thinking on that?” or
  • “What was going on for you?” or
  • “What were you hoping to accomplish?  or
  • “What was your goal?”

Having a discussion on intent and motivation can help clear up any misunderstandings or misperceptions.

A great thing about the SBI Model is how we can use it for ANY feedback and observations that we have about someone’s behaviour. It doesn’t have to always be about difficult conversations!

We can apply and practice using the model when giving positive feedback so that we’re better prepared and less anxious to use it when giving negative feedback or having a potentially awkward conversation.

 

If you missed parts one and two of this series, check out:

 

Want to discuss a career, HR, or training-related matter? Reach out today for a free and confidential initial consultation by phone, email, or via direct message on Twitter, Facebook or LinkedIn.

 

More than career coaching, it’s career psychology®.

 

I/O Advisory Services Inc. – Building Resilient Careers and Organizations.™

Latest Posts

Becoming Ready for Potential Downsizing

Becoming Ready for Potential Downsizing

The dread of potential downsizing looms over many workplaces, particularly in volatile times. Whether driven by economic downturns, technological changes, or strategic shifts, organizations may need to reduce their workforce to survive while remaining operational. Naturally, the fear of potential job loss can create a tense and uncertain atmosphere among employees. However, preparing effectively for such an eventuality can diminish your anxiety and position you to manage the potential transition smoothly.

What Does It Mean to Demonstrate Authentic Leadership?

What Does It Mean to Demonstrate Authentic Leadership?

Inexperienced leaders must recognize the difference between playing the “character” of what they think a leader should be and what authentic leadership is. This requires self-reflection and intentionally developing a genuine leadership style based on their own strengths, values, and a keen understanding of the team’s dynamics. Otherwise, their approach will seem hollow or one-sided and come across as inauthentic.

Including Gen Z, four generations in the workplace. What’s the secret to making it work?

Including Gen Z, four generations in the workplace. What’s the secret to making it work?

In today’s dynamic workplace, organizations are navigating a unique era in which the workforce spans four distinct generations Baby Boomers, Generation X, Millennials, to the emerging Generation Z or “Gen-Z.” With each generation bringing its own set of values, skills, and work styles to the table, building an effective, cohesive multigenerational team presents opportunities and challenges.

Exploring the Consequences of Microaggressions in the Workplace

Exploring the Consequences of Microaggressions in the Workplace

During past training sessions, I’ve provided empirical and concrete examples of how discrimination and microaggressions can hurt more than the intended victims. Here, I’ll share one clear example, inspired by a recent TV interview, of how microaggressions and chronic mistreatment can impair retention and hurt the majority.