Difficult Conversations: From Painful to Productive (Part 3 of 3)
Difficult Conversations: From Painful to Productive (Part 3 of 3)

co-workers avoid difficult conversationsIn Parts One and Two of this blog series, I wrote about how conflict avoidance seems to be the most common—but also the most ineffective—strategy for handling difficult conversations.

Not only is conflict avoidance an ineffective strategy, but putting off difficult conversations (including delivering feedback) frequently sees relatively minor, easily rectified issues linger and escalate to the point where workplaces can become toxic, reputations are harmed, and people outright quit their jobs.

Countless business/organizational failures are the result of avoiding difficult conversations because people were afraid to raise contentious issues until it was too late.

Understandably, many equate a difficult conversation with an argument, and we immediately envision the worst-case scenario – a highly emotional confrontation fueled by anger, frustration and raised voices, resulting in nothing more than lingering resentment and repercussions and a situation where there’s a perception of a winner or a loser. But let’s face it, the more contentious it is, the more likely everyone loses in some way.

But when we approach difficult conversations as opportunities for constructive debate, we set ourselves up for outcomes that are actually productive and rewarding for everyone. The classic win-win situation!

I had a conversation recently with someone who recommended a framework for handling challenging conversations from The Center for Creative Leadership. It’s called the Situation-Behavior-Impact (SBI) Model. I’ve used some other models and techniques over the years, but I like the simplicity of the SBI approach and how it applies to many workplace situations.

The SBI Model gives us a framework for giving feedback, so we can stay focused and avoid being judgmental. It makes us pause and ask questions before we fill in the blanks or make assumptions about the person or situation. We have to be careful NOT to jump to conclusions based on our past experiences in similar situations.


Overview of the SBI Model:

  • Situation [S]: Describe the situation and the event that occurred in a specific and straightforward manner. Focus on the facts by describing the behaviour you observed, without adding your personal interpretations.
  • Behaviour [B]: Describe the behaviour without judging it. Don’t assume you know someone’s intention or thinking. Be curious and give the other person an opportunity to explain, rather than judge or jump to your own conclusions.
  • Impact [I]: Describe your thoughts and/or how you felt about the behaviour. How did their actions affect you and/or others on the team? Focus on information that can be observable/measurable.


difficult conversations with coworkersHere are some examples to help make this more concrete:

Situation: Describe the specific situation in which the behaviour occurred. Avoid generalities, which can lead to confusion and defensiveness.

Example:      “Yesterday at our 10 am meeting …”

Avoid:          “You tend to,” …  “You always,”  or   “Last week.”


Behaviour: Describe the actual, observable behaviour. Stick to the facts. Don’t insert what you think their intention or thinking was, or make judgments.

Example:      “You interrupted me while I was talking.”

Avoid:          “You were rude, …”  or    “You probably think …”


Impact: Describe the results of the behaviour. In this step, you’re describing exactly what happened and explaining your feelings — not passing judgment — and the listener is more likely to absorb what you’re saying.

If the effect was positive, words like “happy” or “proud” help underscore the success of the behaviour. If the effect of the behaviour was negative and needs to stop, you can use words such as “troubled” or “worried.”

“I was impressed by how well prepared you were for that meeting,” or “I was frustrated when you interrupted me in the middle of an important train of thought.”


One More Thing: Intent

This is where you can get some clarification on someone’s actions and turn the feedback process into more of a productive two-way discussion.

  • “What was your thinking on that?” or
  • “What was going on for you?” or
  • “What were you hoping to accomplish?  or
  • “What was your goal?”

Having a discussion on intent and motivation can help clear up any misunderstandings or misperceptions.

A great thing about the SBI Model is how we can use it for ANY feedback and observations that we have about someone’s behaviour. It doesn’t have to always be about difficult conversations!

We can apply and practice using the model when giving positive feedback so that we’re better prepared and less anxious to use it when giving negative feedback or having a potentially awkward conversation.


If you missed parts one and two of this series, check out:


Want to discuss a career, HR, or training-related matter? Reach out today for a free and confidential initial consultation by phone, email, or via direct message on Twitter, Facebook or LinkedIn.


More than career coaching, it’s career psychology®.


I/O Advisory Services Inc. – Building Resilient Careers and Organizations.™

Latest Posts

What do HR Departments do?

What do HR Departments do?

During a recent chat with some new university graduates, we discussed the function of a Human Resources (HR) department. In the midst of that casual conversation, it occurred to me from their comments that while I have 20+ years of understanding of what goes on in the HR department, younger people who are just starting out might have no idea at all.

The Hidden Realities of Frenemies at Work

The Hidden Realities of Frenemies at Work

On the surface, frenemies might appear supportive and friendly, but their actions or words can subtly or overtly undermine, sabotage, or criticize. This kind of relationship can be particularly complex … When this happens at work, where one’s livelihood is at stake, it can be especially difficult.

Post-Pandemic Physical Return-to-Work Mandates? (Part Two)

Post-Pandemic Physical Return-to-Work Mandates? (Part Two)

In my last post, More Post-Pandemic Return-to-Office Mandates? (Part One) I talked about some of the positives of a physical return-to-work (or reduced remote work). This week I’ll look at some of the trickier aspects and why working at home is so much better for some — plus some of the benefits of a hybrid work arrangement.

More Post-Pandemic Return-to-Office Mandates? (Part One)

More Post-Pandemic Return-to-Office Mandates? (Part One)

Once buzzing with life, the modern office is often quieter in today’s post-pandemic world – despite return-to-office (hybrid) mandates or the threat of these mandates.

With many employees still working remotely or hybrid, desks remain vacant. A new challenge has arisen. Despite research published by the Harvard Business School and Fortune Magazine showing that remote workers are more productive, some employers claim that in-office work boosts productivity. A tug-of-war has emerged between management eager for a full (or at least hybrid) return to work and employees cherishing the flexibility of working remotely.